| |
Mock-Ups & Unwanted Conditions
In seeking what has been referred to as
"spiritual freedom" or "higher awareness", we have all encountered the
postulated or promised goals set forth in some methodology we've
explored. One, apparently attractive and popular goal, has been "total
cause". Such a state may exist for a person in their own universe, but
to attain this in the physical universe, would deny the idea that
others cause things. Additionally, if one is in this physical universe,
he perceives. And when one is perceiving, he is at effect. But why
should it be a loathsome idea to be at effect. To listen to a beautiful
musical piece, to view a gorgeous work of art, or to eat an Ice Cream
Sunday. Such things that people enjoy would not be a problem for them.
For
the idea of "total cause", or some other such goal to be attractive to
people, they must have some personal unwanted condition or conditions
they would hope to resolve by attaining this goal. It would seem much
more productive to concentrate on the resolution of the unwanted
conditions of the individual, rather than the arbitrary goals
originated by another. I would therefore like to focus on some
particular aspects of the handling of unwanted conditions.
There
is a technical datum I think is particularly applicable here: "Any
aberration is simply an ability gone out of control". One ability, I'm
certain all people have, is the ability to mock-up. A mock-up is
basically a visualization of something, whether real or imagined. One
may mock-up for any number of reasons. But our concern here is with
mock-ups in relationship to unwanted conditions. And in alignment with
the above technical datum, we would be more concerned with the idea of
automatic mock-ups and mock-ups an individual made and got stuck with.
To mock-up is an ability. To mock-up automatically, out of control is
an aberration. And I believe that it is this aberration at the bottom
of any unwanted condition of which one is complaining.
To
illustrate, I would like to tell you about a recent client we had at
Survival Services for Idenics processing. It should be noted that this
story is published with that client's consent.
This
person was bothered by what he called "night visitations" which he felt
were extraterrestrials. These "visitations" would come when he was
asleep or in what he described as "a sort of half sleep". Afterwards,
he would awake terrified and feeling completely disoriented. As with
others who have had similar experiences, he had trouble deciding
whether the incidents actually happened or were just his imagination.
In
working with this man, he discovered some very enlightening things for
himself. He found that some of the incident did actually happen and
some of the incident was what he called "his imagination". He felt he'd
actually had a casual contact from "ETs", but what really flowed from
them to him was something as simple and light as "hello". But having
been well versed and "educated" into various scenarios and provable
intentions and activities of extraterrestrial, he mocked up all sorts
of horrible things these "ETs" were doing and then responded to these
MOCK-UPS with terror and upset. When fully able to sort out for himself
what actually flowed to him and what he mocked up, all upset with these
incidents vanished, and he's had no problems since.
Granted,
this is a rather unusual illustration and open to all sorts of
interpretation from others. However, it does demonstrate a point about
mock-ups, and I'm only reporting this as the client saw it. And as far
as I'm concerned, how the client views what happened to him is the only
VALID interpretation.
But this phenomenon of
automatic and out of control mock-ups as a source of upsets and
unwanted conditions is very much apparent with anyone in life.
Something flows to one from someone or something in the physical
universe. They automatically make mock-ups about what flowed, and then
respond to these mock-ups. Not separating what actually flowed and what
they mocked up, at the very least, brings about a distortion of what
one perceives. What one causes and what one perceives gets all balled
up.
If one could fully separate what flowed to
them from what they mocked up - If one could fully acknowledge what
actually happens in the physical universe and take credit for and be in
control of their own mock-ups - I think then a person would be in
extremely good shape. This, of course, takes some good inspection on
the part of the person. And apparently, if done properly, people find
outside assistance with this inspection very useful.
A
system would be extremely valuable that truly assisted people in this
inspection and didn't get in their way. To be really successful, such a
system would have to be very non-judgmental. This system would fully
encourage inspection of what was there, and refrain from opinion and
education of what "should be" there. this non-evaluative aspect is
especially important since we are dealing with such an ability as
mocking up. The individual is already "suffering" from automatic
mock-ups. He doesn't need a new collection of mock-ups on top of those
he's already carrying around.
Such a system's
workability fully depends on a practitioner's ability and willingness
to completely trust and believe in the people he works with, and to
view each person as the full source of information about themselves,
which they truly are.
But I leave it to you, the
practitioner. Deal with the personal unwanted conditions of the client,
or, pursue some arbitrary goal set down by you or another. Deal with
the client's mock-ups that are already on automatic and he's stuck
with, or educate him in things you hold to be valuable and important
until he mocks these things up too. You, the practitioner, must decide
what you will do. But I will hazard a guess, that any client first
going somewhere for assistance, would have no trouble making an
unequivocal decision on this matter. | |
|
